The Importance of Legal Support for Business

Legal support for businesses is crucial, especially in the context of a complex and ever-changing regulatory environment. Lawyers not only assist in resolving emerging issues but also in preventing potential risks, ensuring that the company’s operations comply with international laws and regulations. Neglecting legal advice can lead to unpredictable consequences, such as the loss of contracts, legal disputes, or even the closure of the business. Therefore, it’s important to understand when to seek legal counsel and how preventative measures can protect your business from legal risks.

When to Consult a Solicitor

In instances where specialised legal assistance is required, it is advisable to seek the services of Anatoly Yarovyi, a solicitor from the law firm Interpol, who has considerable experience in the field of international law. The decision to pursue legal intervention should be made considering a variety of factors specific to your business’s operations. In certain situations, legal support is not only desirable but essential.

Starting a business or entering new markets

Starting a business or entering new markets requires thorough legal groundwork. Legal advice is essential for choosing the most suitable business structure, registering the company, preparing foundational documents, and ensuring compliance with the regulatory requirements of the country where you plan to operate. It’s also important to consider international aspects, such as tax regulation, intellectual property protection, and adherence to international treaties.

Drafting or reviewing contracts

Drafting and analysing contracts are key areas where legal support plays a crucial role. Contracts must be drafted with all legal nuances in mind, including the obligations of the parties, termination conditions, and dispute resolution procedures. An international lawyer can help avoid hidden risks that could lead to financial losses or legal disputes. Special attention should be paid to international contracts, where it’s necessary to consider differences in legal systems and requirements.

Intellectual property protection

Protecting intellectual property is one of the most crucial aspects that requires legal intervention. Whether it concerns patenting, trademark registration, or copyright, legal support ensures that all procedures comply with legislation and protects your innovations from unlawful use. In the context of globalisation, intellectual property becomes a valuable asset, and its effective protection necessitates knowledge of international standards and practices.

International trade

International trade is fraught with numerous legal risks associated with customs regulations, compliance with international sanctions, and licensing requirements. An international lawyer specialising in international trade can assist you in properly handling export-import operations, avoiding fines and sanctions, and ensuring compliance with all international requirements. Furthermore, it’s crucial to consider the legal aspects related to the conclusion and execution of international contracts, including terms of delivery, payment, and dispute resolution.

Compliance with sanctions and licensing

Adhering to sanctions and licensing are areas where the absence of legal advice can lead to serious consequences. In the context of global sanctions and increased enforcement, businesses must be particularly cautious when entering into transactions with foreign counterparts. A solicitor can help determine which sanctions are applicable in your field of activity and ensure compliance with all regulatory requirements. It’s also crucial to properly arrange for export licenses for goods and technologies to avoid infringements and potential fines.

Data confidentiality and cybersecurity

In the context of digitalisation of business, issues of data protection and cybersecurity are becoming increasingly pertinent. Breaching data protection legislation, such as the GDPR in Europe, can lead to substantial fines and loss of reputation. A solicitor can assist you in developing a privacy policy that complies with international standards and ensures the protection of your clients’ and partners’ data. Moreover, it’s essential to consider cyber risks and develop strategies to prevent them in order to avoid data breaches and cyberattacks.

The Benefits of Proactive Legal Advice

Preventative legal advice can significantly reduce risks and prevent the emergence of legal issues. Consulting a solicitor at early stages allows for the timely identification of potential threats and the implementation of measures to eliminate them. This may include developing internal company policies in line with international standards, conducting legal audits, as well as training staff on the basics of legal regulation.

To Get Legal Advice

Securing qualified legal assistance is not just about protecting your business from legal risks, but also an investment in its successful development. Lawyers help companies not only comply with laws but also utilise legal opportunities for growth and expansion. In an era of globalisation and increasingly complex regulatory frameworks, it’s crucial to have a reliable legal partner who can ensure legal safety and support the business in any legal matters.

The post When to Consult a Solicitor: Key Indicators for Businesses appeared first on Law-LG.

What are OFAC Sanctions?

OFAC is a division of the US Department of the Treasury responsible for implementing economic and trade sanctions against states, organisations, and individuals that threaten the national security or foreign policy interests of the USA. OFAC sanctions can include asset freezing, transaction bans, and restrictions on access to financial resources. A key element of the sanctions regime is the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN), which includes companies and individuals with whom business dealings are prohibited.

Sanctions can be global or targeted at specific countries, such as Iran, North Korea, or Cuba, or at particular types of activities, including the financing of terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, or human rights violations. Breaching OFAC sanctions can lead to serious legal consequences, including substantial fines and criminal prosecution.

The Impact of OFAC Sanctions on International Trade

OFAC sanctions have a direct impact on international trade, creating a multitude of complexities for companies operating on a global scale. Firstly, they can lead to the disruption of existing trade relationships if business partners fall under sanctions. This can disrupt supply chains, which in turn may lead to delays in deliveries, increased costs, and a reduction in market competitiveness.

Furthermore, OFAC sanctions may limit companies’ access to financial markets if banks and other financial institutions refuse to conduct transactions with counterparts that are under sanctions. This could seriously hinder the execution of international payments and the financing of trade operations, which is particularly crucial for small and medium-sized enterprises reliant on access to credit and international finance.

It’s also important to consider the reputational risks associated with potential breaches of sanctions. Companies caught violating sanctions can face significant reputational damage, which will affect their business reputation and relationships with clients and partners.

Challenges for Companies Engaging in International Trade

One of the key challenges for companies engaged in international trade is the need to comply with the complex and ever-changing requirements of the OFAC sanctions regime. Companies must stay abreast of current sanctions lists and continually monitor their counterparts to avoid inadvertently breaching legislation.

An additional complexity arises from the fact that OFAC sanctions can extend to subsidiaries and branches outside the US, necessitating corporations to coordinate their actions on an international scale. Companies must also consider potential differences in the legislation of the countries where they operate, which requires the involvement of specialists in international law and compliance with local regulations.

Particular attention needs to be paid to conducting business in countries under strict sanctions, such as Cuba or Iran. In these instances, companies face increased risks and may require special permission from OFAC to conduct certain operations, which also adds complexity to the process of managing international trade.

How to Navigate OFAC Sanctions in International Trade

To successfully navigate the sanctions regime imposed by OFAC, companies must develop and implement effective sanctions compliance programmes. These programmes should include regular employee training, the development of clear procedures for vetting counterparties and conducting financial transactions, as well as the use of modern technologies to automate monitoring processes.

Particular attention should be paid to working with sanctions relating to Cuba, which historically remains one of the most stringently regulated jurisdictions. Conducting business with Cuban companies requires meticulous analysis and, in some instances, the acquisition of special licences from OFAC. Violation sanctions against Cuba could lead to serious legal consequences, including the imposition of fines and a prohibition on doing business with American companies.

It’s also crucial to engage with professional solicitors specialising in sanctions who can assist in devising compliance strategies and minimising risks associated with international trade. These solicitors can offer advice on licensing issues, assist with conducting internal audits, and develop defence strategies in the event of claims from regulatory bodies.

Are you Looking for Sanctions Lawyers?

If you’re running a business on an international scale, collaborating with solicitors specialising in sanctions can become a key element of your strategy for compliance and risk minimisation. They will assist you in navigating the complexities of sanction regulations, develop effective compliance programmes, and ensure the protection of your interests should disputes with regulators arise.

In an environment of constant changes to the sanctions regime and increasing scrutiny from regulatory bodies, securing the services of qualified professionals has become an integral part of successful international trade. Don’t gamble with your business – seek assistance from experts who can help you navigate the complex world of international sanctions.

The post The Impact of OFAC Sanctions on International Trade: What You Should Know appeared first on Law-LG.

However, in order to file that document, any newly-formed LLC is also required to find a registered agent in NJ state, which must be done before registering an LLC. Below, we’ll explain what a registered agent is and how to find one to meet the needs of your business best.

What Is a New Jersey Registered Agent?

Essentially, a registered agent (RA) is an official point of contact between an LLC and the government entity, appointed to handle legal documents and official notes sent to the company. 

It’s also the person (or company), responsible for notifying LLC members of the receipt of these documents and sending reminders to ensure the company’s compliance with the calendar. 

Why Use a Registered Agent in NJ?

Legal formalities aside, having a resident agent is beneficial for businesses in many ways. Here are just some of them: 

• First things first, it gives you privacy. Rather than listing your own details and exposing them to the public, you can provide your registered agent’s name and address; 
• Secondly, RAs help avoid sensitive situations by discreetly sending your paperwork online, so you don’t have to deal with them in front of your clients;
• In addition, you get peace of mind knowing that your LLC’s documents are kept in good standing and handled in compliance with the calendar;
• Besides, with a registered agent, you can enjoy more freedom and organize your work hours as you see fit without being tied to the office; 
• Lastly, if you decide to open a foreign LLC at any stage, a RA will let you establish your presence at any specific location. 

Who Can Be a Registered Agent?

A registered agent can be any resident of New Jersey who has a physical street address in the state and is aged 18 or older. You can also be your own registered agent if you don’t mind processing paperwork and can cover business hours, which are from 9:00 to 17:00. 

In general, however, hiring a professional RA company is much preferable, especially since the cost of a RA in New Jersey isn’t that high, ranging from $50 to $250 per year.  

How to Find a Registered Agent in New Jersey

If you want to reduce costs, you can designate your friend or even your neighbor as a registered agent to receive and handle documents on your behalf. Alternatively, you can choose one of the RA companies, which New Jersey has in abundance. 

If you already have an idea of what company you want to hire, all you need to do is type in its name in a Google search. Be sure to check the registered address of the company you have chosen – it must be within the state of New Jersey. 

You may also want to check the company’s availability in other states, which can be important for LLCs planning to expand their business in the future. 

Other than that, it is a good idea to read through clients’ reviews. Obviously, all agents for service of process will tell you that they are the best in the field, but, in fact, not all of them are, and users’ feedback can help you determine who is the most genuine.

Finally, look into the cost and value of the service. Make sure you choose a provider that offers a full range of services, including same-day document processing, and there are no added or hidden fees to pay.

The post How to Find a Registered Agent in New Jersey appeared first on Law-LG.

Although the federal government is active in IP law to the maximum extent permitted by the Constitution, state laws are still important to IP law. Therefore, it is important to note that human rights and obligations can only be fully understood with reference to federal and state law.

Government Regulatory Agencies.
Congress has delegated regulatory authority relevant to IP to the following federal agencies:

The U.S. Copyright Office at the Library of Congress registers copyright applications and makes copyright assignment records in accordance with the Copyright Code. Unlike other agencies, the Library of Congress is organized under the auspices of the legislature.

The USPTO under the Department of Commerce grants United States patents under the Patent Code, registers trademarks under the Lanham Act, and handles some disputes through either the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) or the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Department of Health and Human Services administers theFDCA, including preservation of exclusive data rights, patent term extensions, and other forms of sui generis intellectual property under the Act.
The Office of Plant Variety Protection under the Department of Agriculture administers the Plant Variety Protection Act by issuing certificates of protection to plant breeders.

The Indian Arts and Crafts Council of the Department of the Interior administers the Indian Arts and Crafts Act.by issuing certificates of protection to breeders.
The CMT, an independent agency within the executive branch, handles IP disputes related to the importation of potentially infringing goods.

Regulatory Framework and Current Issues

Copyright
Copyright protection in the United States is authorized by the Copyright Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Current copyright laws are codified in Title 17 of the United States Code. The federal copyright statutes are compiled in Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Federal copyright law has superseded most state copyright law since 1978.

Copyright is automatically correlated with the creation of an original work of authorship; however, registration with the Copyright Office is useful in copyright litigation and necessary to obtain statutory damages in the event of infringement. In many cases registration is required before filing a lawsuit against the infringer, although registration does not change the existence of protection.

Integrated circuit topologies or topographies (topography) of integrated circuits are protected under US copyright law, although protection is more limited than in the case of other copyrighted works.

U.S. copyright law is based on the utilitarian concept that copyright should encourage the creation of works rather than protect the personal rights of the author. This purpose of copyright is established in the Constitution: “to promote science and useful crafts.” Thus, the United States recognizes only minimal non-property rights of authors under copyright law. In passing the Berne Convention Implementation Act, the US Congress stated that the non-property rights in Section 6bis sufficiently protected by laws outside the Copyright Code, such as defamation, unfair competition and publicity[10]. An exception is the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA), which is part of the Copyright Code, but applies only to works of visual art and considers only attribution and integrity rights. U.S. law does not distinguish between copyright and related rights.

Patents and utility models
Patents in the United States are allowed by the Patent Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Until recently, the United States used a “first-to-invent” patent system in which competing patents or patent applications determine their priority based on the date of invention. The America Invents Act moved the United States in 2013 to a more general “inventor first to file” system in which priority is based on the filing date. The patent code is contained in Title 35 of the United States Code. The federal regulations pertaining to patents are collected in Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Patents are governed exclusively by federal law.

The USPTO regularly publishes a Manual of Patent Examination Procedure (MPEP) for use by patent attorneys, agents, and examiners. The MPEP describes all the laws and regulations that must be followed in the examination of U.S. patent applications and references relevant case law. The USPTO also deals with patent applications as outlined in the MPEP. While patent attorneys may be used to assist in the application process, the USPTO has a separate examination for those who practice patents. Therefore, there are “patent agents” who, while not lawyers, are permitted to practice before the USPTO.

Three types of patents can be granted:

Invention patents (for any new, useful and non-obvious process, machine, article of manufacture or composition of components, or any new, useful and non-obvious improvement thereof),
design patents (for any new, original and artistic design of an industrially produced product) and plant patents (for any distinctive and new variety of plant reproduced by asexual reproduction, except for plants propagated by rootstocks).

The current utility patent term is twenty years from the earliest claimed filing date, but it can be extended to compensate for delays at the patent office or in obtaining FDA approval under the Medicines Price Competition and Patent Term Renewal Act (also known as the “Hetch-Waxman Act”). The FDCA also has quasi-patent rights in the form of exclusive market rights for manufacturers of both generic and patented drugs under certain circumstances. For example, exclusive market rights are granted to orphan drugs developed specifically to treat rare diseases under the Orphan Drug Act.

Under limited circumstances, U.S. law provides for a one-year grace period for filing after disclosure. In general, the first disclosure must be made by the applicant or by someone authorized by the applicant to make the disclosure.

Emerging areas of intellectual property
Genetic Resources.
U.S. law does not address the protection of genetic resources under intellectual property.

Traditional knowledge and cultural expressions
The Indian Arts and Crafts Acts of 1935 and 1990 (IACA) were enacted to encourage the development of Native American arts and crafts, to protect and preserve cultural heritage, and to prevent commercial interests from fraudulently associating their goods or services with Native peoples. The Indian Arts and Crafts Council, created by the 1935 Act, may refer IACA violations to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and may also recommend that the United States Attorney General (Department of Justice) initiate criminal prosecutions or civil enforcement actions. Criminal and civil penalties include large fines and imprisonment.

The USPTO Tribal Distinctive Signs Database permits registration and promotes the protection of the emblems or symbols of any federally or state-recognized Native American tribe that are brought to the USPTO by the tribe itself, by providing evidence of the relationship between the tribe and its distinctive signs. However, registration provides no additional benefit to the distinctive marks and is not considered a trademark. Therefore, the primary use of registration is to prevent third parties from registering a trademark containing such distinctive marks.

The post The intellectual property system and related laws appeared first on Law-LG.

Criminal penalties may apply to the use of trademarks for criminal counterfeiting of goods and to the dissemination of trade secrets under state and federal law. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, as part of the Department of Homeland Security, plays an active role in protecting intellectual property rights, including identifying and seizing counterfeit goods. Meanwhile, the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section of the U.S. Department of Justice oversees national efforts to combat intellectual property crimes.

Civil Remedies
Federal court proceedings involving lawsuits between private parties are governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). Many states have adopted civil litigation rules modeled on the FRCP; however, significant exceptions are New York and California. State civil procedure laws may take the form of codified legislation passed by the state legislature or judicial rules issued by the state supreme court.

Notable features of the U.S. civil procedure are as follows:

• Lengthy pre-trial filing and discovery procedures,
• heavy reliance on direct testimony taken under oath or in front of a jury,
• an active pretrial practice of “legal arguments and motions” designed to lead to summary judgment, fewer issues presented for resolution at trial, and settlement between the parties,
• the withdrawal of the class action, and
• by default, the parties cover their own attorneys’ fees, although numerous statutory systems provide for coverage of attorneys’ fees and costs in certain cases.

The vast majority of enforcement actions in intellectual property matters involve private litigation between the owner of the IP right and the person accused of violating it.

U.S. federal courts have exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over civil cases arising under patent laws. A patent holder may choose to pursue a case in the CMT instead of, or in addition to, the federal civil court system. However, the only remedy available from the CMT is to prevent further importation of infringing products into the United States. Questions concerning the validity of patents can also be raised before the PTAB in the USPTO.

U.S. federal district courts also have exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over copyright. A plaintiff may be entitled to equitable relief, damages for monetary damages and compensation for attorneys’ fees. Claims of copyright infringement brought against the United States and not arising in a foreign country must be brought in the United States Court of Federal Claims within three years after the infringement occurred. Only compensation for monetary damages is due for suits against the U.S. government.

Trademark law is enforced almost entirely through private lawsuits, and failure to completely stop their infringing use by others can result in loss of protection. Depending on the lawsuit and the relief sought, the case may be brought in either state or federal court. Issues concerning the status of a registered trademark or trademark application can also be raised before the TTAB in the USPTO.

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has exclusive jurisdiction over appeals arising under patent law as well as appeals from the U.S. Court of Federal Claims , PTAB, TTAB and KMT. Federal Circuit decisions are overturned only by federal law or decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Awareness and Education
The USPTO develops curricula on enforcement, patents, trademarks and copyright through the Global Intellectual Property Academy. Most law schools in the U.S. and often other types of graduate programs offer programs or classes focused on intellectual property issues.

The post Defense and adjudication appeared first on Law-LG.

All law in the United States is subject to the federal Constitution. When a conflict arises, applicable federal law overrides state law. However, only Supreme Court decisions are binding on the states. Decisions of federal intermediate appellate courts are binding only on federal district courts within the relevant region, but are not binding on state courts. Although the formulation of laws is clearly divided between the federal government and the states, adjudication is not. State courts are competent to hear suits brought under federal law, and federal courts are competent to hear suits brought under state law under certain general conditions, such as cases where the litigants come from different states.

Thus, the U.S. Constitution defines the hierarchy of federal law:

The U.S. Constitution is the fundamental law of the United States. Laws that conflict with the Constitution may be declared invalid by a court. There have been only 27 amendments since the Constitution was ratified, 10 of which were finalized at the same time, shortly after the Constitution was ratified.
Legislative acts are the general basis for federal legislation. Proposed legislation must go through Congress and be signed by the president. On the other hand, if the president rejects a piece of legislation that has passed through Congress, it can still become law if 2/3 of each house of Congress votes to invalidate such a veto. Legislative acts are published in the Code of Laws and codified in the United States Code (U.S.C.).

International treaties ratified by the Senate are treated as the hierarchical equivalent of legislative acts. Courts in the United States, based on the common law role of judges, will make every effort to interpret domestic law in a manner consistent with international obligations. However, when a treaty provision irreconcilably conflicts with a piece of legislation, what is later enacted is the law applied by the United States courts.

Regulations passed by federal agencies under the Administrative Procedure Act are enforceable, but they must be consistent with both the Constitution and statutory law. However, under the “Chevron doctrine” (Chevron), the judiciary reckons with a government agency’s reasonable interpretation of some statute under its jurisdiction. Statutory acts are published in the Federal Register and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.).

Case law has legal force, which varies depending on the court issuing the decision. Case law is published in national, regional, or state “dockets,” and the dockets themselves are bound volumes of published court decisions. With respect to lower courts, not all decisions are published, and only those that are published have precedential value.

An independent evaluation of the laws of most states has revealed great discrepancies between the laws of the various states. Organizations such as the American Law Institute (ALI) and the Uniform Law Commission (ULC) have tried to create more uniform state laws through model laws and carefully reasoned summaries. ALI publishes the texts of the Body of Law, which summarizes the current state of a topic of American law according to the consensus of the U.S. legal community, and the Principles of Law, which frame the law as it should be framed, on topics that now need legal guidance.

The post Structure of the legal system appeared first on Law-LG.

The present United States Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787, and ratified by a sufficient number of states on June 21, 1788.The U.S. Constitution and federal laws are “the supreme law of the land” (Article VI, paragraph 2). Therefore, when there is a conflict between federal and state law, federal law prevails. The Constitution divides the federal government into three powers, with checks and balances preventing any one power from gaining too much power:

Article I defines the legislative branch, which consists of a bicameral Congress-the Senate and the House of Representatives-with specific powers, the most important of which is the power to make laws. However, legislation can only be passed for certain limited purposes as defined by the Constitution. Most related to IP are Section 8, clause 8 (patent and copyright clause, “to promote science and useful crafts by securing for a specified period to authors and inventors the exclusive rights to their writings and discoveries”), and Section 8, clause 3 (trade regulation clause, “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among individual states, and with Indian tribes”). Congress also has implied powers under Section 8, Clause 18 (necessity and appropriateness clause: “to make all such laws as shall be necessary and proper to carry into effect the foregoing powers, and all other powers conferred by this Constitution upon the Government of the United States or upon any department or officer thereof”).
Article II grants executive powers to the president, who is head of state, head of government, and commander-in-chief. The president appoints cabinet members and other high-ranking officials-with the approval of the Senate-to direct and enforce federal laws and policies. The director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) needs confirmation, as does the librarian of the Library of Congress. The Registrar of Copyrights does not need one. The President has the power to sign international treaties, but treaties also require Senate ratification. In addition to the USPTO, the International Trade Commission (ITC) is also part of the executive branch. Both the USPTO and the CMT can adjudicate certain IP disputes within their specific areas of expertise, even though both agencies are part of the executive branch, not the judiciary.

Article III establishes the judiciary as one Supreme Court and lower federal courts created by Congress. Federal courts have jurisdiction to hear cases arising under the U.S. Constitution, federal laws and regulations, and international treaties. Other cases may be heard in federal courts, depending on the parties to the case. Today there are 94 federal district courts, and their decisions may be appealed to one of 12 regional intermediate appellate courts. In addition, specialized trial courts are the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and the Federal Court of International Trade. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is an intermediate appellate court with nationwide jurisdiction to hear appeals concerning patent laws and cases decided by the CMT, the Court of International Trade, and the Federal Claims Court.
Each state is a separate sovereign entity with its own constitution, legislative, executive, and judicial powers. Powers, which the U.S. Constitution does not delegate to the federal government and does not prohibit the states, are reserved to the people of the states. The states, in turn, have delegated some governance-related powers to local agencies, townships, counties, cities, and special districts. Thus, under U.S. federalism, citizens are subject to several levels of government: the federal, state, and local levels. Any U.S. citizen can be subject to several local levels of government, such as township and county.

The post Form of government appeared first on Law-LG.